Thursday 14 July 2016

Top 5 football stars with cassanova status

Don’t these guys understand that they are in the public eye and, therefore,
there are always eyes on them? These playboys either never got the message, or had dug themselves too deep a
womanizing hole to crawl out of, frolicking around with a small army of beauties or, even worse, the better half of
fellow teammates.


5 Cristiano Ronaldo
The Portuguese superstar is one of the best soccer players on the planet, but much of his fame can be attributed to
movie star-like good looks and an impressive Rolodex of stunning arm candy. Models Alice Goodwin, Gemma
Atkinson and Irina Shayk are just a few of the gorgeous women that Ronaldo can count among his previous
conquests. Ronaldo, who has done some modelling work of his own for Armani, was briefly engaged to Shayk, but has
otherwise embraced a bachelor lifestyle. And with some of. the women he has bagged, who wouldn’t??

4. Gabby Agbonlahor
The fancy footwork of striker Gabby Agbonlahor has helped the 28-year-old to a long, successful career at Aston Villa.
But it’s his juggling skills that have enabled a rather active personal life. After all, it can’t be easy to handle three
girlfriends at once, as Agbonlahor reportedly once boasted.
His fertility also shouldn’t be called into question, as he impregnated all of them. In 2012, a judge handed
Agbonlahor’s ex-flame Sophie Smith a 10-year restraining order against current partner Elizabeth Wheeler in a cyber-
stalking case.

3. Ashley Cole
The British tabloids loved Ashley Cole , a serial philanderer who put his poor wife, Cheryl, through years of pain and
humiliation as report after report emerged of his extra- marital goings-on. The couple, however, remained together
until he was caught sending naked pics to a glamour model’s phone in February 2010. That ultimately proved to
be the final straw, as Cheryl soon filed for divorce, citing “unreasonable behavior.” In all, there were no less than seven allegations of extra-marital affairs made about Cole.

2. John Terry
Unlike some of the men on this list, John Terry hasn't accumulated a harem of young beauties over the course of
his playing career – at least not that we know of, anyway. But the indiscretion that he is well-known for sent the British
tabloids into a tizzy in 2010, as he engaged in an alleged affair with French underwear model Vanessa Perroncel.
Perroncel was not only the best friend of Terry’s wife, Toni, but she was also the former flame of Chelsea teammate
and best friend Wayne Bridge. Although the true story never fully came to light, England took away Terry’s captaincy and
Bridge soon retired from international competition.

1. Antonio Cassano
One must always be skeptical of the man who spreads a legend through his own words, but it’s hard to ignore Italian
attacker Antonio Cassano’s revealing biography, La Dico Tutto (translated to mean “I’ll Tell You Everything”). If the
book is to be believed, Cassano had bedded between 600 and 700 women in the 11 years prior to the book’s release.
The provocative Cassano lived by the belief that sex on the day of a game significantly enhanced his performance on
the pitch.

Top 10 celebrities that insured their body part for ridiculous amount

Okay just when we complaining of lack of money and over inflation of everything i happen to stumble on this. In no particular order 

10 David Beckham – Legs ($35 Million Each)
Next is line is the soccer star David Beckham. From what is
known, he actually got each of his legs insured for, wait for
it, let the drums roll, A FULL $35 MILLION. It is said that the
insurance is meant to cover him against all kinds of injury or
disfigurement considering that he is also a model.
This bit of protection was sought by David Beckham back in
the year 2006. Considered the largest personal insurance
policy that was ever taken out in the history of sports at the
time, the policy is rumored to have been split among several
insurance companies. It is further rumored that it isn’t just
his legs that David Beckham got insured – he had his entire
body insured for around $195 million back in 2006. Given
that much of his income came from selling his good looks in
commercial deals, he was also covered in the event of
disfigurement.😕

9 Daniel Craig (entire body part $9.5m)
The famous James Bond actor Daniel Craig had his entire
body insured for $9.5 million during the shooting of
Quantum of Solace considering that it involved having to
perform several dangerous stunts.
If anything, the actor is known to have set pulses racing
when we first saw him emerging from the sea in blue shorts
starring as James Bond. It has been reported that the actor
chose to have his entire body insured for an unbelievable
sum of $9.5 million when he started shooting for Quantum of
Solace. This is because he wanted to protect himself against
any mishaps that might occur while he performed all of his
own stunts. For the record, he insisted on performing most
of his stunts on his own and this is the reason why he and
the producers chose to insure his whole body for this
significant amount of money.😯

8 Cristiano Ronaldo – Legs ($144 Million)
So are you ready to get shocked by learning how much the
less-than-humble Cristiano Ronaldo got his legs insured for?
Well, the Real Madrid star’s legs have been insured for an
out of this world $144 million – that’s probably far more
money than an average individual can make over a lifetime!
The Real Madrid forward is believed to be one of the highest
insured athletes of all time. His insurance policy goes over
103 million euros and that covers him in case of any and all
injuries that might occur to his legs. Overall, his massive leg
insurance is definitely impressive. Reports from Spain
suggest that his insurance valuation has risen about 3% in
the last few years. Although it is common for clubs to have
their players insured in order to protect their investments,
the policy for Cristiano Ronaldo is one of the highest in
world of sports. Such coverage protects the club against
serious injuries, particularly if the player was forced to
retire.

7 Julia Roberts – Smile ($30 Million)
Ever since the world laid its eyes on Julia Roberts in Pretty
Woman , it was obvious that the girl had a million dollar
smile. But do you have any idea at all as to how much she
got her smile insured for? $30 MILLION! Now that’s news,
isn’t it?
Most people across the world are completely in love with
Julia Roberts and her smile. However, what a majority of
them don’t know is that she actually got her beautiful smile
insured for a full $30 million. With that amount of money,
Julia’s smile has hit the list of top celebrities who have had
their body parts insured. According to Julia Roberts, the
reason why she got her smile insured is because she
believes it has immense market value. Although Julia
Roberts has stopped making regular appearance in movies,
the fact of the matter is that her smile is definitely
contagious.

6 Mariah Carey – Legs And Vocal Chords ($70 Million)
The fact of the matter is that celebrities love using their
bodies so as to build a “personal brand” – sex continues to
sell and it is natural for celebrities to want to safeguard
their most important selling points. For Mariah Carey, this
wasn’t just her voice – it was her legs too and she got them
insured back in 2006. Believe it or not, Mariah Carey’s voice
and hamstrings are insured for a combined $70 million, an
insane amount for even the richest of celebs. The diva is
known to be the star of the Gillette 2006 Legs of a Goddess
campaign and hence ended up insuring her body parts for
the unbelievable crazy sum. Now she only needs to prove
that they were worth the investment.


Wednesday 13 July 2016

Top 5 Gov ayodele fayose WTF moments

Meet the man, the myth, the legend Gov ayo fayose whose boldness and the bluntness has earned him popularity self acclaimed voice of the common man but let's just read his WTF moments
(1) Wrote to the chinese government not to lend nigeria money. Preview of the letter
I am one of stakeholders in the project Nigeria, and a governor of one of
the federating units making up Nigeria, to draw your
attention to report that the Federal Government of Nigeria is
on the verge of obtaining a $2 billion loan from the Export-
Import Bank of China.
“This $2 billion loan is part of the N1.84 trillion the Federal
Government of Nigeria has proposed to borrow to finance
the 2016 budget, which is yet to be signed by the President,
Muhammadu Buhari owing to unending controversies
between the Executive and Legislative arms of government.
“According to reports, Nigeria desires to raise about $5
billion abroad to cover part of its 2016 budget deficit. This is
projected to hit N3 trillion ($15 billion) due to heavy
infrastructure spending at a time when the slump in global
oil prices has slashed the country’s export revenues
“While conceding that all nations, especially developing ones
need support to be able to grow because no nation is an
island, I am constrained to inform you that if the future of
Nigeria must be protected, the country does not need any
loan at this time.
“The government of China should be mindful of the fact that
Nigerians, irrespective of their political and religious
affiliations are totally opposed to increment of the country’s
debt burden, which is already being serviced with 25 per
cent of the Federal Government annual budget.
“It will interest the government of China to know that some
of the projects for which the loan is being sought are not
captured in the controversial 2016 budget, which has been
sent to the President by the National Assembly for his
assent. For instance, the Lagos – Calabar Rail project was
not included in the budget proposal the President presented
to the National Assembly and it was not included in the
Appropriation Bill passed by the National Assembly.
“Most importantly, Nigeria is presently servicing debt with
about 25 per cent of its annual budget and what will happen
to the economy in 2017, when the country will begin to
service the additional debt to be incurred this year is better
imagined than experienced.
“The Chinese government must also be aware that some
western nations approached by the Federal Government for
loan diplomatically and cleverly declined.
“Therefore, like the foreign aid that is reportedly being
mismanaged, whatever loan that is granted to the Federal
Government of Nigeria by the Chinese Government may be
mismanaged too.

(2)  He allegedly gave a speech at the Multinationals
Sourcing Service Centre, PAzhou Trade Complex,
Guangzhou, China, canvassing for the support and
empowerment of Nigeria,he even claimed the chinese trip yeilded $6bn investment. According to reports the site is a popular tourist attraction where people can stand on the podium and take picture ..#selfie governor

(3) Admitting to buying property worth 1.35bn six month after he became a governor but he claim its money for political campaign and friends

(4) Gov ayo fayose has constantly insulted the president during the election period and after he was elected.some of his comments were "buhari is too old","buhari is clueless","buhari is an illiterate,"buhari is patron of the fulani herdsmen","buhari this buhari that" 😰

(5) He made a very ludicrous statement when the NLC ekiti state chapter threaten to go on strike over unpaid salary,fayose said he'll gladly join them since there is no money

we have couple of political celebrities sen ben murray bruce,sen dinu malaye, Hon patrick(egemegodo), raji fashola , and the uncouth ayo fayose, but if USA can have donald trump ,we just gotta have fayose

Monday 11 July 2016

5 Most Overrated Movies Of 2016 (So Far)

Five most overrated movies in 2016

2016 has been a weird year for movies so far, in the ratings department abroad, lots of movies have been unnecessarily slamed and tons of wack and mediocre ones have been praised to high heaven..

These are the movies that have been given a lot more credit than they deserve, either by the critics, audiences, or both


5)florence foster jenkins-a lot of critics describe this movie as "unashamedly feel-good," which has caused me to furrow my brow and say to no one in-particular: "Really? This?"

It might or should have been that film, of course, an endearing and heartwarming biopic about a woman triumphing against the odds, but there is an underlying nastiness to Florence Foster Jenkins that stops it from being exactly that: the same kind of mean-spiritness that made Susan Boyle a star. Because despite the "zero to hero" nature of Boyle's story, she was - and still is - something of a joke.

That's not to say that Florence Foster Jenkins isn't accurate, because the life of the real Florence Foster Jenkins was ripe with ridicule. Here, though, it's as if director Stephen Frears can't quite find the right approach to the material; is this suppose to be a tribute to its titular singer, or is it poking fun at her?

So whilst Meryl Streep is fantastic and Hugh Grant delivers one of his most unexpectedly great performances, there's an awkward clash as the film tries to find Jenkins as a subject to be laughed at and admired at once. You can imagine Frears off camera during every scene, giggling at the absurdity of it all. Florence Foster Jenkins should have been an uncomfortable film, or a funny one, but perhaps not both.

An yet it holds just four negative reviews on Rotten Tomatoes; genuinely surprising given that, tonally, the film is as all over the place as Jenkins' voice was.
4)barbershop3(fresh cut)-sadly for me,. If you're unfamiliar with the Barbershop movies, they're bound to look godawful from an outsider's perspective. On the contrary, the first two films in this underrated franchise are actually pretty funny, and you might be surprised to learn that both the original and its sequel are "certified fresh" on Rotten Tomatoes.

On the basis of its trailer, though, what with its broad gags and Nicki Minaj butt shots, Barbershop 3: A Fresh Cut looked poised to ruin the franchise, and then all of a sudden it was out in cinemas and the critics were giving it rave reviews. It currently holds a score of 90% on Rotten Tomatoes. Unexpected, to say the least.

As a genuine fan of the other Barbershop films, I have to come out and say it: this is an complete and utter step backwards pretending to be a step forwards; gone is the irreverence and fun of the original movies, replaced with a strange and unfitting sentimentality. It's all a bit cringeworthy, to be honest.

A lot of critics deemed the more family-orienated nature of Barbershop 3 to be a step in the right direction, but in a lot of ways it kills what was great about the series as it moves into more "realistic" territory. It's admirable for a comedy to touch on key issues like violence in U.S., I suppose, but it's also slightly odd for a Barbershop movie to do it. When you opt for said "serious" approach, it's jarring to suddenly interject with a gag about Nicki Minaj's skimpy outfits.

You can't hate on Barbershop 3 for at least trying to stay relevant, but the reviews have overestimated this sequel all out of proportion.
3)love and friendship-Love & Friendship, Whit Stillman's latest film based on two novellas by Jane Austen, emerged this year from out of nowhere and was instantly declared a masterpiece of witty period shenanigans by all those who ventured to see it. Love & Friendship is a essential Whitman classic," they said. "It's perfect," they said.

Surely the praise that has been granted to this rather average and slightly annoying drama is totally misjudged, though? Only one critic - you read that right: one - gave Love & Friendship a negative notice on Rotten Tomatoes, and I find that baffling considering how smug and impenetrable this film is for the length of its runtime.

Love & Friendship has been called "broad and accessible," but it's neither. What Whitman has done here is create a comedy so dry that it's never really apparent when or what you're supposed to laugh at. The plot is hard to follow, scenes drag, performances are pitched at different levels... it's not even that "fun" to watch.

So did the critics collectively agree to adore this film out of some misplaced fear that they'd be deemed stupid or uneducated if they did the opposite?

What is properly good about this film, then? Kate Beckinsale, who transcends her reputation as the vampire girl from the terrible Underworld movies and confirms that, hey, she's a talented actor and has been unfairly regulated to blockbuster rubbish when she should be doing stuff like this (or not this, but you get what I mean).

But that's about it: she's a shining light in a film that feels otherwise alien. A film that leaves you under the impression that you were too dumb to get it. And that isn't really the case. There just isn't all that much to "get."
2)dealpool-Deadpool made a hell of a lot of money at the box office, and in the process proved that audiences were hungry for R-rated superhero films. It did a hell of a lot better than anyone thought it would, too; a clever, self-aware marketing campaign and word of mouth brought the punters into theatres worldwide, and they lapped it up.

Look closely, though, and it becomes painfully obvious that - for all its merits - Deadpool only half works; it's an incredibly safe and by-the-numbers superhero flick masquerading as something edgy and irreverent, when really we've seen it all before, often done far better than it is here. Ryan Reynolds is fantastic, of course, but what else about Deadpool actually stands out and sticks with you?

Not to mention that only half of the jokes land. The others... well, they're a bit cringeworthy. A twenty-year-old reference to Sinead O'Connor? A gag about Deadpool mistakenly leaving the stove on? C'mon, guys... is that stuff funny? Is it really?

There's a novelty to Deadpool that means it received fantastic reviews and a positive audience buzz, but I'm not sure the movie itself is worthy of such notices. Watching it, one might find themselves a tad frustrated when the film refuses to go further - to really push the meta nature of character and create something memorable.

In the end, Deadpool is a pretty average superhero outing, albeit with added violence, swearing and a few knowing winks to the audience. But it's not enough.
1)hail ceasar-This should have been the best film ever.

Hail, Caesar! has to be the one of the most disappointing films ever made, especially when you consider everybody involved and the fact that it's one giant homage to the Golden Age of Cinema, complete with George Clooney in screwball mode.

The only good thing in this film is future Han Solo actor Alden Ehrenreich, though, who manages to bring a charm to an otherwise charmless and surprising rigid film. There are so many bizarre creative decisions on show in Hail, Caesar!, after all: why make Josh Brolin's studio fixer into a nice, reputable guy, when writing him tough and brutal like his real life equivalent - the morally questionable movie mogul Eddie Mannix - would have made for a way more interesting film?

Then there's the episodic nature of the "motion picture segments," none of which are anywhere near as exhilarating or fun to watch as they are in the trailer. Also: the timing is off, the jokes aren't funny, and the plot is bewildering and pretentious. With so much at their disposal, it's genuinely shocking that the Coens turned in such a forgettable picture. There is no plot; there is no momentum; there is no point.

There's a sense that the critics went easy on this incredibly lacklustre film because the Coens made it, because otherwise how did it garner 85% on Rotten Tomatoes? I'd go as far to say that it's their worst film to date - an uninspired, weightless hodgepodge that totally fails in its attempts to even provide a single worthwhile laugh.
Worse than The Ladykillers, this one - and the year's most overrated film by a mile!

Which other over-rated films of 2016 so far belong on this list? Share yours below in the comments thread.

Sunday 10 July 2016

The 15 Most Ridiculous Lawsuits Ever





Often times the lawsuits, if not totally ethically warranted, are at least logical: “Please contact our law offices if you or a loved one have been diagnosed with X disease as you may be entitled to compensation.” It’s basically greed masquerading as philanthropy: Please contact us! We are DYING to get your you your money!!!

The following lawsuits are so wacko, so obviously morally bankrupt cash grabs, that even Sokolove would refuse to represent them. It’s almost as though the accusers’ full time job is filing lawsuits. If you’re curious, keep reading to find out about  fifteen of the most ridiculous lawsuits ever filed.

15. Audi Driver Strikes And Kills Boy, Sues Family For Damages

In January of 2008, Tomas Delgado was rocketing along the highway in his Audi A8 when he struck young cyclist Enaitz Iriondo. The crash killed the boy on his bike, but also, and apparently more importantly, caused 14,000 Euros of damage to the all-aluminium luxury car.

Understandably miffed that Iriondo’s body had busted up his car when he struck the poor, fragile human with 2 tons in motion, Delgado sued the Iriondo family for reparations, making the case that the cyclist was responsible since he had been wearing black at night. The moral of the story is don’t invite him to the funeral or he will crush everyone in his car and say they were basically asking for it.


14. Woman Stricken On Non-Pedestrian Highway, Sues Google Maps

In 2011, Lauren Rosenberg accessed Google Maps on her BlackBerry to find her way home. The list of directions she was given clearly indicated that some steps might be missing sidewalks or footpaths. Undeterred, Rosenberg mounted the highway on foot.

It being night and there being no sidewalk, she was almost immediately hit by a car. She sued both Google and the driver Patrick Hardwood. The court sided with Google, citing, among other things, that Google Maps is very convenient for the public, and granting this would open the company to “near unlimited liability” for litigation.



13. Cleanthi Peters Sues Universal Studios for “Fear, Distress, And Anguish” Over Haunted House

shutterstock_58071349

In 1998, Cleanthi Peters accompanied her ten year old granddaughter in the haunted house at the Universal Studios theme park. Near the end of the experience, a Universal employee jumped out at them with a chainsaw. This spooked them, so they fled and then slipped on a wet spot on the floor.

This left them with unspecified physical injuries and “extreme fear, emotional distress and mental anguish.” Peters demanded $15k in reparations, over which Universal Studios could more legitimately sue her for fear, distress, and anguish.


12. Man Sues Wife for Return of Life-Saving Kidney

Richard Batista hoped his organ donation would serve two purposes: one, to save his wife from kidney failure, and two, to save his failing marriage. It unfortunately only accomplished the former. Batista’s marriage lasted but four more years, until 2005, when his wife filed for divorce.

Having essentially bribed her to stay with him by putting a kidney in her, when she filed for divorce, Batista sued her for his kidney back, offering an alternative $1.5M settlement option. If she was going to cheat on him and then leave him, he thought, she could make do with her own sub-par organs.


11. Insurance Corporation Sues Helpless Old Lady Over Tumble on Her Property

Dolores Tanel, an employee of a meal-delivery service in Brookfield, slipped and fell on some ice in 2004 when bringing food to the octogenarian Anne Keipper’s home. Keipper remembers seeing Tanel fall and then allowing another employee to use her phone to call an ambulance. No details on whether the food was still warm when the famished senior finally got to eat.

Three years later, Keipper received a notice from Tanel’s insurance company, Sentry Insurance, that we she was being sued for damages. An involuntary plaintiff in the case, Tanel could not be reached for a comment.





10. Woman Sues McDonald’s Over Boiling Point of Water

79-year-old Stella Liebeck sued McDonald’s in 1992 after she spilled a 50 cent cup of coffee onto herself in a parked car and gave herself severe burns. Given that the car was parked, we are surprised that Liebeck did not also press charges against her central nervous system for having Parkinson’s.

However frivolous the suit, the jury awarded Liebeck $160,000 in compensatory damages and $2.7 million in punitive damages. Today, we have the “Stella Awards,” which go out annually to the year’s most inane legal claims.


9. Jack Ass Sues Jackass Over Defamation of Character

In 1997, Montana man Bob Craft legally changed his name to Jack Ass to supposedly raise awareness about the dangers of drunk driving; who doesn’t think about drunk driving when you hear Jack Ass?

In 2003, the man, who represented himself, sued Viacom for $10 million in damages for injury to reputation and defamation of character because of the release of their feature film Jackass. Apparently, the movie made him look bad by association. As reckless and dumb as the Jackass boys are, even they wouldn’t change their name to Jack Ass.


8. Woman Sues College Over Unmarketable Degree

Arguing, essentially, that a college degree or diploma guarantees employment, Trina Thompson of New York City sued her alma matter, Monroe College, for the seventy grand she spent on a bachelor’s degree in information technology. She is also demanding $2,000 to ease the stress of a three-month job search that yielded nothing.

In Thompson’s opinion, any employer would be lucky to have a student with a 2.7 gpa like hers, but the office advancement favors those with a 4.0 or closer. When asked if she would encourage other students to sue their alma matter, she assented enthusiastically.


7. Woman Frames Wendy’s By Adding A Finger To Her Chili, Sue

In 2005, Anne Ayala bought an order of chili from a Wendy’s in San Jose. With a severed finger her husband, Jaime Plascencia, had purchased from a co-worker, she rendered the soup extremely FDA un-approved. She then filed a claim with the franchise.

However, lab tests revealed no traces of saliva on the digit, which there would have needed to be in order for Ayala to determine it was “crunchy.” The tests also showed that the finger was not consistent with something cooked in chili for three hours. Ayala and her husband were both imprisoned on conspiracy to fraud and grand theft.


6. Cleaners Lose Judge’s Pants, He Takes Them to Cleaners

Custom Cleaners in Washington D.C., like every other dry cleaner in the galaxy, promise “same-day service” or “satisfaction guaranteed.” When the company lost a pair of judge Roy Pearson’s pants in 2007, he sued them for $67 million dollars.

The judge ruled in favor of the storeowners, but they had to shut down two locations to finance their legal bills. Pearson was fired because it was deemed that he lacked “appropriate judgment and judicial temperament.”


5. Man Sues Beer Company For False Advertising

In 1991, Richard Overton sued the beer company for false advertising, claiming that it caused emotional distress, mental injury and financial loss. The case was dismissed due to the obvious fantasy of most alcohol marketing.

Later, in an interview with the Kalamazoo Gazette, Overton said that the image of him as a sexual no-show who drinks Bud Light so he can get girls was false; he’s married with three kids. But he wanted to challenge the industry’s advertising style because he didn’t like seeing his children so captivated by it.


4. Man Sues Himself For $5 Million For Violating His Own Civil Rights
A prisoner at the Indian Creek Correctional Center in Chesapeake, Robert Lee Brock sued himself for the violation of his civil rights for $5 million dollars in 1995. His argument was that by going out and getting drunk, he got himself arrested, which is contrary to his religious practices. However, since he did not have $5 million dollars to cede to himself, he asked that the state provide it for him.

Judge Rebecca Beach Smith, unimpressed with the ludicrous claim and the handwritten, seven-page lawsuit, still applauded him for his “innovative approach to civil rights litigation.” The case was thrown out.






3. Like Mike? Like Hell! Man Sues Michael Jordan For Slight Resemblance



In 2006, Oregon man Allen Heckard sued basketball legend Michael Jordan for $416 million dollars, saying that their slight resemblance had caused him emotional pain and suffering, defamation, and permanent injury.

He said that he couldn’t go out in public without being mistaken for the basketball player, even though he’s six inches shorter than him (he did not add that last part, nor did he remove his single earring or Air Jordan sneakers.) Heckard finally dropped his suit against Michael Jordan, as well as his suit against Nike, which allegedly made Jordan a star, for the same amount.


2. Psychopathic Pimp Sues Nike Over Lack of “Dangerous Weapon” Disclaimer on Their

In 2013, Sirgiorgiro Clardy, a violent pimp in Portland, stomped on a man’s face after he refused to pay for his prostitute. The john required stitches and plastic surgery. Clardy, in response, sued Nike from prison for not adding disclaimers that their products can be used as violent weapons.

He said: “Under product liability there is a certain standard of care that is required to be up-held by potential dangerous product,” never acknowledging that he was deemed “an anti-social psychopath who is 100 percent likely to commit crimes again” by his trial psychologist.


1. Drug-Addicted Criminal Sues McDonald’s Over Napkins; “I Am An Immaculately Clean Person”

Webster Lucas went to eat lunch at McDonald’s in January of 2014. With his brown bag of food, he was only given one napkin. When he asked the manager Angel Arciga for more, the manager mumbled something about “you people,” meaning black people, under his breath.

Lucas then filed a $1.5 million dollar lawsuit against the company for the “undue mental anguish” of both not having enough napkins and being treated unfairly when he wanted more. During the trial, Lucas’s history emerged: in 1985, he was sentenced to 27 years and eight months in state prison for sexually assaulting and robbing an 18-year-old man in a jail cell at a Los Angeles police station. He did not remember the incident because he was high on PCP.

Friday 8 July 2016

The 5 poorest Nigeria A'list Artistes

The music industry is filled with glam and glamour, young men beautiful women who are constantly trying to look the part or look better than the average person, fast forward the entire opening speech then we have instagram the single tool used by our "RICH" artiste to flaunt the wealth they don't have, we at justblunt have created a wind "more like a hurricane"  fowl yansh won't just open, it will scatter. These are your top 5 poorest A'list artistes in Nigeria 
(5) Terry G  this self proclaimed madman shot up to prominence with some mad tracks(free madness 1,2,3 , sexy, etc) and mad dance moves, he in all honesty had a mad career that is madly going down the drain.  Before you say yes I agree (cos dere is no reason not to), can you remember the last time you saw Terry G on TV, the last time he trended was because he beat up a DJ(SMH), so in entirety what we saying is all Terry G blings will only get you a yoghourt in Ibafo. 
(4) JAYWON  Am not really comfortable about his inclusion on this list,  do the get me wrong as far as the industry goes he's poor the bone of contention is "is he even an A'list artiste". He doesn't have an endorsement that we know of, all of his new tracks are whack, he doesn't have a career direction, he lost face, fame, wealth, he should just do an Eva, quit! (that's disrespect to Eva) 

 (3) TIMAYA  The king of freestyle, this dude will freestyle over beat from pangolo(tin can), but with very few endorsement, limited fan base, and not so many sought After tracks we arrive at the only logical explanation for his wealth "DRUG TRAFFICKING". Timaya will      push bags of coke across planets if need be according to a reliable source, but we only about the legit money. 
(2) 9ice   once regarded as the 9ja artiste closest to the Grammy, personally am not a fan of his, no doubt he is very much talented but he talks without putting much thought to it am still shock he is a special adviser of a governor. He has no endorse know of, all his recent tracks has been nothing short of pathetic, he has a big mouth, his style is way out of dat and unless dasuki gave him money he's sure broke, even the state is working for is cash strapped. 
(1) Eldee the don   the originator of the defunct group trybesmen, owner of the fucked up record label trybes record. It's true he had his time of fame but his dealings in the industry in recent years is nothing short of pathetic. But as an entrepreneur that he is he noticed this and shifted his attention to a new business "strip club and prostitution" the firm is located in the heart of lekki, and according to our source that is where we met yemi Alade (we don't want to go into details), but we can tell you categorically that she had clients. 


Disclaimer  this post contains information that are very true, the facts have been screened by our seasoned industry experts but if you actually believe this God knows you crazier than me. 

The Nigeria security or insecurity


The most important function of the government is provision of security, protection of lives and property but how secure are we in fact how secure do we feel.
Nigeria have in power a government whose major agenda is to rid the system of corruption, it is visible to the blind and audible to the deaf the onesidedness
Of the anti-corruption train (but that's another days story). It's no news that over-the-counter past few years Nigeria has been battling terrorism,  security experts have blame the then government who failed to curb the menace during its Inception (it's a case of uprooting the weed before it grows out of hand) , so the current government met a terrorized country, under armed military, a rotten economy and a pretty much uninformed intelligence agency. We can make comparison between Nigeria and some well developed countries like America, Britain, France on how they tackle terrorism but the fact is Nigeria is a poor poor 57yrs  old 3rd world corruption infested fucked up. Country (hands on the Bible).
The current government first move was to strengthen our borders and pally with neighboring countries like Chad, Cameroun, Benin, and to go in the war against boko-haram, the second move was procurement of arm and ammunition for the military and the after effect was the recovery of lost lands, before the inception of this government boko-haram held 14 local government captive, at the time of this writing the military have taken back this lands.
But security is more than boko-haram, if that is the only criterion for everluating the government then they get a 4 star **** 👏 but there is the rise of militancy, the rise of kidnapping, pipeline vandalism and the blood thirsty herdsmen. Although Rome wasn't built in a day but different measures had to be taken to better our security and strengthen our security agencies.
First is the issue of community sensitization. It is pertinent to note that there is no secured country anywhere (even the unconquerable Israel) but those that are seemingly secured have done that with great help from its citizens, it's baffling that Nigeria don't have a national security dialing code (like 911 in USA) although LAGOS STATE has 767 but even it's residents don't know this much less make use of it, citizens should be able to report happenings to security agencies, they should be their eyes and ears and in some cases nose. NB the military had to work jointly with the local hunters in North East to salvage their communities from boko-haram.
There is also the issue of data base although this is a long and gradual process,  but the little data gotten from. Network providers, INEC, banks, jamb and various platforms should b utilized.
The baffling aspect of Nigeria's security is the archaic structure of its police system, who the hell still rely on federal policing in this century!, every state should be entitled to its own state police, this will provide jobs thereby reducing crime and effectively tackle criminality across board. Nigeria has only 350,000 police securing the 170,000,000+ of us, the recruitment of 10,000 more personnel is laudable but it's like a spit in the ocean. State police would be of immense benefit to our security.
Finally the actions of the government promotes or reduces crime and criminality, gross unemployment in the country will only breed crime.  The government should increase the punishment for kidnapping and crime as a whole as its was done in Edo state (in the case of kidnapping)  and there should be  clear borderline between common crime and terrorism. Fulani herdsmen and avengers shouldn't be taken lightly like the case of common crime, the use of assault rifle, 14th, even rocket launcher  to perpetuate crime is an act of terrorism. My final statement(drumroll plzzz) fear is nothing but danger is real, my people we are in danger

 

Thursday 7 July 2016

Year Of The Big Mouth

It's 2016 the year everything changed( can I get a drumroll plzzz), this year have seen the death of legends and the birth of new ones. 2016 has seen hardship and rage like no other.
So if you think 2016 still ain't special, let's see there the rise of Donald Trump,  the olamide vs don jazzy brouhaha, the rise of ISIS, the Paris attack, the fuel price, Muhammad Ali, no more loss, OJB jezerel all gone to the afterlife.
One thing is predominant tho no one is owning anybody this year words are utter with caring bout consequences the after effect is a society with sharp brain and loose mouth
Welcome to justblunt the blog of sharp brain and loose mouth, we give in depth analysis (deep enough for your convenience ), we are very factual, we say our mind no matter whose ox is gored.
Some blog are popular, some are appealing, some are beautiful, we are just blunt.